Milestone map
Milestone map
3 milestones
Describe and plot data
4 weeks (about 6 hrs/week)
Work through OpenIntro chapters 1–2 and the Noba module on statistical thinking. Self-check: OpenIntro odd-numbered exercises. Then make a notebook that describes and plots an open psychology dataset.
Proof required
Link the public repo with a notebook that describes and plots an open psychology dataset: the notebook, the data (or a link to the open dataset) and a README saying what it shows.
What gets checked
- Every variable is described with the right summary.
- Plots are labelled and honest about scale.
- Odd-numbered exercises are checked against the book.
Common mistakes
- Results the files cannot reproduce.
- A summary of the reading instead of your own work.
Powstik Guide
A notebook that describes and plots an open psychology dataset.
Steps
- Read the linked chapter and take the self-check.
- Make a public repo.
- Build the smallest version that works, then check it.
- Write a README: the question, the method, what you found, the limits.
- Ask someone who knows psychology to check it.
Template
README Course 3: Statistics for Psychology Question: Data (source, n, how it was collected): Method: Result: Limits:
What gets sent back
- No data or no code.
- Data from people that breaks the rules above.
- Copied work with no history.
Resources
Foundationstart here
Depthgo deeper
What a verifier looks for
- Every variable is described with the right summary.
- Plots are labelled and honest about scale.
- Odd-numbered exercises are checked against the book.
- Do the files produce what the README says?
You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.
Test a difference and report the effect size
4 weeks (about 6 hrs/week)
Work through OpenIntro's chapters on inference for means and proportions. Self-check: OpenIntro odd-numbered exercises. Then make a t-test or chi-square on open data, with the effect size, its confidence interval and a power note.
Proof required
Link the public repo with a t-test or chi-square on open data, with the effect size, its confidence interval and a power note: the notebook, the data (or a link to the open dataset) and a README saying what it shows.
What gets checked
- The test fits the data.
- The effect size and interval are reported, not just p.
- Assumptions are checked.
Common mistakes
- Results the files cannot reproduce.
- A summary of the reading instead of your own work.
Powstik Guide
A t-test or chi-square on open data, with the effect size, its confidence interval and a power note.
Steps
- Read the linked chapter and take the self-check.
- Make a public repo.
- Build the smallest version that works, then check it.
- Write a README: the question, the method, what you found, the limits.
- Ask someone who knows psychology to check it.
Template
README Course 3: Statistics for Psychology Question: Data (source, n, how it was collected): Method: Result: Limits:
What gets sent back
- No data or no code.
- Data from people that breaks the rules above.
- Copied work with no history.
Resources
Foundationstart here
Depthgo deeper
What a verifier looks for
- The test fits the data.
- The effect size and interval are reported, not just p.
- Assumptions are checked.
- Do the files produce what the README says?
You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.
Fit a regression and pass the final
4 weeks (about 6 hrs/week)
Work through OpenIntro's regression chapters, then take the Saylor MA121 final exam. Self-check: Saylor MA121 final exam. Then make a multiple regression on open data with diagnostics and a plain-language summary.
Proof required
Link the public repo with a multiple regression on open data with diagnostics and a plain-language summary: the notebook, the data (or a link to the open dataset) and a README saying what it shows.
What gets checked
- Coefficients are interpreted correctly.
- Diagnostics are shown and discussed.
- The summary does not claim cause from correlation.
Common mistakes
- Results the files cannot reproduce.
- A summary of the reading instead of your own work.
Powstik Guide
A multiple regression on open data with diagnostics and a plain-language summary.
Steps
- Read the linked chapter and take the self-check.
- Make a public repo.
- Build the smallest version that works, then check it.
- Write a README: the question, the method, what you found, the limits.
- Ask someone who knows psychology to check it.
Template
README Course 3: Statistics for Psychology Question: Data (source, n, how it was collected): Method: Result: Limits:
What gets sent back
- No data or no code.
- Data from people that breaks the rules above.
- Copied work with no history.
Resources
Foundationstart here
Depthgo deeper
What a verifier looks for
- Coefficients are interpreted correctly.
- Diagnostics are shown and discussed.
- The summary does not claim cause from correlation.
- Do the files produce what the README says?
You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.