Prove
LiveProof-of-Work · Oct–Nov: every verified proof counts. 16 days leftAll outcomes
Skills

Psychology 3: Statistics for Psychology

12 weeks · 3 milestones

Describe data, test ideas and report effect sizes honestly. Course 3 of the Varsity Curriculum: Psychology. Free sources only. Foundations only. Not a clinical or counselling qualification.

Part of: Psychology · Proves for: UG

Milestone map

Milestone map

3 milestones

Describe and plot data

4 weeks (about 6 hrs/week)

Work through OpenIntro chapters 1–2 and the Noba module on statistical thinking. Self-check: OpenIntro odd-numbered exercises. Then make a notebook that describes and plots an open psychology dataset.

Proof required

Link the public repo with a notebook that describes and plots an open psychology dataset: the notebook, the data (or a link to the open dataset) and a README saying what it shows.

What gets checked

  • Every variable is described with the right summary.
  • Plots are labelled and honest about scale.
  • Odd-numbered exercises are checked against the book.

Common mistakes

  • Results the files cannot reproduce.
  • A summary of the reading instead of your own work.

Powstik Guide

A notebook that describes and plots an open psychology dataset.

Steps

  1. Read the linked chapter and take the self-check.
  2. Make a public repo.
  3. Build the smallest version that works, then check it.
  4. Write a README: the question, the method, what you found, the limits.
  5. Ask someone who knows psychology to check it.

Template

README
Course 3: Statistics for Psychology
Question:
Data (source, n, how it was collected):
Method:
Result:
Limits:

What gets sent back

  • No data or no code.
  • Data from people that breaks the rules above.
  • Copied work with no history.

Resources

Foundationstart here

Depthgo deeper

What a verifier looks for

  • Every variable is described with the right summary.
  • Plots are labelled and honest about scale.
  • Odd-numbered exercises are checked against the book.
  • Do the files produce what the README says?

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.

Test a difference and report the effect size

4 weeks (about 6 hrs/week)

Work through OpenIntro's chapters on inference for means and proportions. Self-check: OpenIntro odd-numbered exercises. Then make a t-test or chi-square on open data, with the effect size, its confidence interval and a power note.

Proof required

Link the public repo with a t-test or chi-square on open data, with the effect size, its confidence interval and a power note: the notebook, the data (or a link to the open dataset) and a README saying what it shows.

What gets checked

  • The test fits the data.
  • The effect size and interval are reported, not just p.
  • Assumptions are checked.

Common mistakes

  • Results the files cannot reproduce.
  • A summary of the reading instead of your own work.

Powstik Guide

A t-test or chi-square on open data, with the effect size, its confidence interval and a power note.

Steps

  1. Read the linked chapter and take the self-check.
  2. Make a public repo.
  3. Build the smallest version that works, then check it.
  4. Write a README: the question, the method, what you found, the limits.
  5. Ask someone who knows psychology to check it.

Template

README
Course 3: Statistics for Psychology
Question:
Data (source, n, how it was collected):
Method:
Result:
Limits:

What gets sent back

  • No data or no code.
  • Data from people that breaks the rules above.
  • Copied work with no history.

Resources

Foundationstart here

Depthgo deeper

What a verifier looks for

  • The test fits the data.
  • The effect size and interval are reported, not just p.
  • Assumptions are checked.
  • Do the files produce what the README says?

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.

Fit a regression and pass the final

4 weeks (about 6 hrs/week)

Work through OpenIntro's regression chapters, then take the Saylor MA121 final exam. Self-check: Saylor MA121 final exam. Then make a multiple regression on open data with diagnostics and a plain-language summary.

Proof required

Link the public repo with a multiple regression on open data with diagnostics and a plain-language summary: the notebook, the data (or a link to the open dataset) and a README saying what it shows.

What gets checked

  • Coefficients are interpreted correctly.
  • Diagnostics are shown and discussed.
  • The summary does not claim cause from correlation.

Common mistakes

  • Results the files cannot reproduce.
  • A summary of the reading instead of your own work.

Powstik Guide

A multiple regression on open data with diagnostics and a plain-language summary.

Steps

  1. Read the linked chapter and take the self-check.
  2. Make a public repo.
  3. Build the smallest version that works, then check it.
  4. Write a README: the question, the method, what you found, the limits.
  5. Ask someone who knows psychology to check it.

Template

README
Course 3: Statistics for Psychology
Question:
Data (source, n, how it was collected):
Method:
Result:
Limits:

What gets sent back

  • No data or no code.
  • Data from people that breaks the rules above.
  • Copied work with no history.

Resources

Foundationstart here

Depthgo deeper

What a verifier looks for

  • Coefficients are interpreted correctly.
  • Diagnostics are shown and discussed.
  • The summary does not claim cause from correlation.
  • Do the files produce what the README says?

You'll sign in first, then come straight back here.